Synergy Blog

From Roger Baron: AZ federal court refuses to freeze assets held by plan participants so as to support ERISA plan’s claim for equitable relief

Reprinted with permission from Roger Baron

The ERISA Plan in Blood Systems v. Roesler, No. CV-11-02133-PHX-ROS, (U.S.Dis. Az., 11/2/12) sought a TRO and Preliminary Injunction freezing assets held by plan participants and their attorneys.  This court previously granted summary judgment for the attorneys.  This decision denies the plan’s requested TRO and Preliminary Injunction sought against the plan participants.  The Court acknowledges that pursuant to Sereboff, Knudson and 9th Circuit law, the plan “must show the plan participant still possess[es] the funds.”  Nonetheless, the Court is not sympathetic to the plan’s claim that “failure to freeze assets” will likely undermine its ability to seek equitable relief.  As to the plan’s argument that “public interest in stable ERISA group health plans will be undermined,” the court states,

In light of the circumstances here, this public interest is not jeopardized. The public interest is not furthered by allowing plans to freeze a participant’s general assets without support the participant possesses the funds.

To view the court’s ruling, click HERE


Ready to schedule a consultation?

The Synergy Settlements team will work diligently to ensure your case gets the attention it deserves. Contact one of our legal experts and get a professional review of your case today.

Request Consultation


“Synergy is our guiding light for deferring our contingent legal fees and planning for retirement. The lawyers at Panter Panter & Sampedro, myself included, have been working with them for over ten years using different methods to defer comp and plan for retirement.”

Brett Panter
Panter, Panter & Sampedro

"I don't think I've directly said "thank you" for helping us with Bridgett’s case. We sent the reduced payment to Medicaid and called Bridgett's mom to tell her approximately how much money was going to be left for Bridgett and she broke down over the telephone. Given only $25k of insurance and a $850k medical bill from the hospital she didn't think Bridgett would ever see a penny."

Tom L. Copeland
Jeffrey Meldon & Associates, P.A.

WordPress Image Lightbox